🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.